Site Information


New Scandal: Global Elites use trickery to hide at least $AUD 28 trillion of Debt

Posted by John Adams | Chief Economist at As Good As Gold Australia on

The real position of the global economy and of the current global debt bubble is currently hiding behind a mask of accounting and legal trickery.

During the course of 2017 and 2018, two shocking stories were revealed by key global institutions that at least $US 20 trillion (or $AUD 28 trillion) of debt were hidden in systemically important countries and economic sectors through the use of ‘off-balance sheet’ accounting and legal classification techniques.

For example, in September 2017, analysis by the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) [1] discovered that non‑bank institutions outside the United States owed up to $US 13 trillion via financial instruments such as foreign exchange swaps and forward contracts which were hidden in the footnotes of the bank’s financial statements.

The BIS reported that this debt was hidden from the plain view of the market and of the public through the use of contemporary accounting conventions that allowed the classification of these debt instruments as off‑balance sheet items.

According to the BIS:

“For the US dollar alone, contracts worth tens of trillions of dollars stand open and trillion change hands daily. And yet one cannot find these amounts on balance sheets. This debt is, in effect, missing…. The debt remains obscured from view. Accounting conventions leave it mostly off-balance sheet, as a derivative, even though it is in effect a secured loan with principal to be repaid in full at maturity. Only footnotes to the accounts report it.”

Also, in recent weeks S&P Global Ratings reported that at least 40 trillion yuan or $US 5.8 trillion of debt within the Chinese local government sector has been concealed through the use of ‘off-balance sheet’ classifications [2] in order to meet the ‘debt quotas’ set by the Chinese national government. Such quotas have been an important policy measure for officials in Beijing who have sought to rein in total level of debt within the Chinese economy.

Such is the quantum of debt uncovered by S&P credit analysts, that these analysts believe the overall level of Chinese local government debt carries significant systemic risks for the Chinese economy and therefore carries important implications for the global economy. Alarmingly, S&P analysts stated in their report that “the potential amount of debt is an iceberg with titanic credit risks.”

However, and unfortunately, these case studies of accounting and legal masking techniques are not isolated examples.

At the individual corporate level, examples abound across the world of corporations using a variety of ‘aggressive accounting’ techniques to improve the appearance of the company’s financial performance and financial position.

For example, the former second largest construction company in the UK, Carillion who declared insolvency and collapsed in January 2018, used a variety of accounting techniques [3] to artificially inflate its revenue and therefore its profits, but also to mask significant debts and therefore present a robust balance sheet to the market and to shareholders.

Such accounting techniques were also present prior to the collapse of Lehmann Brothers in September 2008 [4] and the major corporate collapses of Enron and Worldcom in the 2001.

More broadly, these case studies are typical examples of such accounting and legal techniques that are often employed during economic booms and financial bubbles. Indeed, analysis and commentary by UK investigative reporter Richard Brooks in his 2018 book, “Bean Counters – the triumph of the accountants and how they broke capitalism” illustrates that during financial booms:

  • auditing standards tend to be watered down, resulting in audits either not identifying or not addressing significant instances of financial risk, financial mismanagement or accounting issues;
  • accounting and financial fraud increases; and
  • the deployment of aggressive or creative accounting techniques which are permissible within the accounting standards are used with greater frequency.

This behaviour manifests itself throughout key sectors such as governments, financial institutions and other large corporations as they seek to exaggerate their financial position and performance in order to:

  • artificially promote economic, business, investor and customer confidence that spurs further economic activity and growth through additional investment and consumption;
  • meet and even exceed the economic expectations of select stakeholders such as corporate shareholders; and
  • realise short-term personal gains (e.g. through higher executive compensation and higher share prices).

It is concerning that these reported examples are most likely the tip of the iceberg and provide another warning sign that a global financial debt bubble is evident, and that the bubble is likely to be materially larger and more unsustainable than that which is publicly understood.

The implications resulting from the deployment of such techniques are significant, not only for public policy makers, but also for the average Australian citizen who is managing their own economic affairs.

For Australian policy makers who are responsible for:

  • assessing Australian and international economic and financial market conditions including determining domestic and international levels of systemic risk; and
  • setting macroeconomic and macroprudential policies such as fiscal, monetary and banking policies;

the deployment of such techniques that cannot be identified in real time mean that policy makers are likely to have incomplete data and therefore inaccurate risks assessments.

As a result, public policy makers are likely to misread domestic and international economic conditions and set inappropriate public policy settings necessary to promote sustainable economic growth.

Moreover, for the average Australian who is seeking to protect and grow their wealth, the ability to identify the deployment of aggressive accounting techniques, especially for those with either a lack of time or forensic accounting skills, is extremely difficult.

For these Australians, therefore, the ability to assess the commercial attractiveness of potential investment options and of financial risk becomes very challenging.

Alternatively, those Australians who hope that professional financial advisors and investment managers would be better able and better equipped to identify sophisticated legal and accounting masking techniques and therefore be able to protect and grow client wealth are likely to be disappointed.

Professional money managers have, time and again, been caught out by accounting and legal tricks.

A recent example is Scottish Asset Manager Kiltearn Partners who lost approximately 70 million pounds on its investment in Carillion as they relied heavily on the company’s financial statements to determine their investment attractiveness.

Ultimately, Australians who are seeking to protect and grow their wealth, especially during times of economic booms and of financial bubbles, need to consider what asset classes and investment options are less likely to be subject to potential financial accounting and legal trickery and therefore cannot be subject to financial manipulation.

Investors who can allocate capital to specific investments within these asset classes prior to economic booms and financial bubbles collapsing are more likely to retain their wealth relative to other investors who typically experience significant financial losses.

For those investors who are seeking not to be a victim of accounting and legal trickery, the answer lies in real physical assets such as land, real estate, precious metals, fine art and collectables which the owner has direct ownership and physical control over.





Can Physical Silver Really Change Your Life?

As the world heads towards an inevitable economic crisis resulting from an ever rapidly global debt bubble, speculation abounds within elements of the investor community that ownership of physical silver will have the ability, in the midst of the crisis, to change people’s lives potentially on the scale of the 2011 - 2017 price explosion of Bitcoin. Such is the [...]

Read More »

Deposit Insurance Where The Insurer Has No Money To Pay

Australians with bank deposits who believe their deposit is insured by the Federal Government via the Financial Claims Scheme (FCS) may be in for a rude shock. In the aftermath of the collapse of Lehmann Brothers in September and October 2008, Australia experienced a fall in domestic economic confidence and even panic in some quarters. This led to rumours on the [...]

Read More »

Will The Prime Minister Order A 'Smash And Grab' Of Bank Deposits?

Among the people, confidence in the Australian and international banking system is becoming precarious. Ten years on from the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and both Australia and the world are faced with: record levels of Australian domestic and global debt (including as a proportion of the size of the Australian and global economies respectively); a breakout of inflation across the developed and developing [...]

Read More »

The Madness Of Modern Monetary Theory

Australians who are concerned with their economic welfare and standard of living must quickly come to terms with Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). In recent years, a select group of Australian and international academics have advanced MMT as a radical heterodox economic thesis of how an economy can achieve full employment. For these economists, involuntary unemployment is considered the greatest economic evil [...]

Read More »

RBA Is Actively Blowing Up Australia's Biggest Debt Bubble Until It Breaks

Australians must quickly come to the realisation that the country is suffering from a chronic failure of public policy as it relates to official interest rates and the Australian Government’s monetary policy framework. Last week, the board of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) kept official interest rates at 1.5 per cent, the 24 th consecutive month since August 2016. Moreover, the [...]

Read More »

Be Wary of the Fallacious Net Household Debt Argument

Australians should treat claims that household debt is not a concern carefully. In recent weeks, two prominent columns, one by Don Stammer, titled ‘ Housing crash unlikely, based on real debt levels’  in the Australian published on 19 June 2018 and another by Michael Pascoe titled, ‘Why household debt is not as scary as generally claimed’  in the New Daily on 25 July 2018 have [...]

Read More »

APRA Airbrushes Australian History To Avoid Economic Armageddon

Australia has truly entered the uncharted twilight zone. Last week, Chairman of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Wayne Byres delivered a speech entitled ‘preparing for a rainy day’ . The Chairman, as part of this speech, outlined a range of policy initiatives that APRA has implemented in recent years to reduce risky lending practices by domestic authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) as [...]

Read More »

Mike Maloney: The Top 10 Reasons I Own Gold and Silver

via Mike Maloney and When the average investor thinks about gold, they may view it as an inflation hedge. Or maybe as crisis insurance. Or perhaps solely as a portfolio diversifier. These are all good reasons to own gold—but those are always good reasons to buy precious metals. Mike Maloney’s reasons to own gold and silver [...]

Read More »

Bank Crisis and Debt Explosion as Billionaires keep buying Gold and Silver

There have been a number of points of interest since our last newsletter which should give you a continued reason to add to your stack of silver and gold bullion. There are more billionaires and the only trillionaire in the world now  accumulating gold and silver in their portfolios. At the end of our seven points [...]

Read More »